[Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: CAP-12-a: Stored queries still?]]

Doug Royer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.calendar
Organization http://INET-Consulting.com
Message-ID <[email protected]>


Andrea Campi wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:29:09AM -0400, [email protected] wrote:
> 
>>Recently I asked for examples of where its really useful and really has 
>>benefit versus the cost and complexity to CS implementations.  Of the 2 
>>people on the list who wanted to keep them (Doug & Andrea), neither 
>>responded.  Why is that?  Instead of showing a benefit for them, you try 
>>to deflect the issue now by saying already been covered.  In fact, it was 
>>not resolved.
> 
> 
> Just to clarify my personal position: I am in a release frenzy right now,
> so I have almost 0 time to read the list. This subject however caught
> my attention just because I took part in the discussion before.

What about the round trip time to go fetch the VQUERY manually,
then re-submit it as a query? That saves bandwidth and octets
for ALL devices and help slow and memory limited devices.

-- 

  Doug Royer                     |   http://INET-Consulting.com
  -------------------------------|-----------------------------
  [email protected]                 | Office: (208)612-INET
  http://Royer.com/People/Doug   |    Fax: (866)594-8574
                                 |   Cell: (208)520-4044

                 We Do Standards - You Need Standards
smime.p7s (application/x-pkcs7-signature, 4.5 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.