[Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: CAP-12-a: Stored queries still?]]
Doug Royer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.calendar |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://INET-Consulting.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Andrea Campi wrote: > On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:29:09AM -0400, [email protected] wrote: > >>Recently I asked for examples of where its really useful and really has >>benefit versus the cost and complexity to CS implementations. Of the 2 >>people on the list who wanted to keep them (Doug & Andrea), neither >>responded. Why is that? Instead of showing a benefit for them, you try >>to deflect the issue now by saying already been covered. In fact, it was >>not resolved. > > > Just to clarify my personal position: I am in a release frenzy right now, > so I have almost 0 time to read the list. This subject however caught > my attention just because I took part in the discussion before. What about the round trip time to go fetch the VQUERY manually, then re-submit it as a query? That saves bandwidth and octets for ALL devices and help slow and memory limited devices. -- Doug Royer | http://INET-Consulting.com -------------------------------|----------------------------- [email protected] | Office: (208)612-INET http://Royer.com/People/Doug | Fax: (866)594-8574 | Cell: (208)520-4044 We Do Standards - You Need Standards
smime.p7s
(application/x-pkcs7-signature, 4.5 KB) - not displayed