Re: [Fwd: Re: CAP-12-a: Stored queries still?]

[email protected] wrote:
> 
> Doug wrote on 09/04/2003 11:22:35 AM:
>  >                           There was nothing new to reply to. Same
>  > question, same answer.
> 
> Actually its more like same question, same non-answer.  
> 
> Everyone from 2 of the other editors to Andrea question the usefulness 
> of this feature in CAP 1.0 given our inability to achieve the original 
> intent.  You seem to be the only one steadfastly opposed to removing it 
> from CAP.

Bruce - 4 people replied today - two said yes (me and it looks as if
Bernard by replying is saying yes, you said no, and Andrea
said no). Bernard proposed the NAME/QUERYID change - do you want
us to think that that means 'NO' to stored queries?

And you just posted TODAY - so don't you feel just a little
bit embarrassed that you declare 'Everyone from 2 of the other
editors...' question ... it?

And you have failed to find *anything* that supports your
assertion of the 'original intent'.

-- 

  Doug Royer                     |   http://INET-Consulting.com
  -------------------------------|-----------------------------
  [email protected]                 | Office: (208)612-INET
  http://Royer.com/People/Doug   |    Fax: (866)594-8574
                                 |   Cell: (208)520-4044

                 We Do Standards - You Need Standards