Re: [Fwd: Re: CAP-12-a: Stored queries still?]

[email protected] wrote:
> 
> Are you now saying that the original intent of stored queries was NOT 
> for thin clients?  Gee, you previously confirmed what I said when you 
> wrote:

So rather than define what you are talking about, you show some
history that has nothing to do with the question.

And what was the original intent?

 >> The original intent was to provide a means for clients to save on space
 >> and cycles by not having to recraft commonly used queries and resend
 >> them.
 >>
 >> And it does save both bandwidth and octets especially when you consider
 >> the 2 sets of QUERY/FETCH required without them.

And it does. And despite your assertion to the contrary, you
still forgot to add in the (1) set of octets to get the XXX
query definition.

--


  Doug Royer                     |   http://INET-Consulting.com
  -------------------------------|-----------------------------
  [email protected]                 | Office: (208)612-INET
  http://Royer.com/People/Doug   |    Fax: (866)594-8574
                                 |   Cell: (208)520-4044

                 We Do Standards - You Need Standards