Re: stored queries

There are really (3) issues:

	(A) Can you store a VQUERY in CAP?
	(B) Can you fetch a VQUERY in CAP?
	(C) Can you tell a CS to auto-execute a stored query?

         Others?

Everyone knows my opinion on these three, yours?

Tim Hare wrote:
> 
> I may be muddying the water here, I am about to leave on un-connected 
> travel, so I hate to start a discussion since I don't have time to 
> search RFC2445 for details until Monday, but this occurred to me this 
> morning and so I submit it to the group.
> 
> RFC2445 allows for x-comp and iana-comp in 4.6.   This allows any CS / 
> CUA that wants to to support stored queries as x-comp members within the 
> CS unless I'm overlooking something else (see above for time shortage).
> 
> I propose that we drop all stored query items from CAP (and for that 
> matter iTIP / iMIP and any other CUA protocols). Any implementation 
> which wants to do so can support them via the x-comp facility. It looks 
> to me as though you can still search for the objects with VQUERY.
> 
> The X- stands for 'experimental', so this would allow us to wait until 
> some "real world" experience has developed around stored queries before 
> we make it a non-experimental part of the RFC; it also removes the 
> burden (from us) of figuring out the CAP handling of such items in 
> detail, moving the CAP closer to being done.
> 
> Tim Hare
> interested bystander, non-inc.
> 

-- 

  Doug Royer                     |   http://INET-Consulting.com
  -------------------------------|-----------------------------
  [email protected]                 | Office: (208)612-INET
  http://Royer.com/People/Doug   |    Fax: (866)594-8574
                                 |   Cell: (208)520-4044

                 We Do Standards - You Need Standards