Re: CAP-12 - interm version 'A'
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.calendar |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OF57BF159A.F57E98AD-ON85256D98.00680F18-85256D98.0068F8C8@notesdev.ibm.com> |
Doug replied on 09/04/2003 09:44:06 PM: > > > I told you and Ned in San Francisco that > > > I was going to oppose ANY AND ALL changes to CAP so that we can get > > it out. > > > > If you are simply opposing any and all proposals made to fix CAP in an > > effort to get it shipped rather than actually considering them then > > there is something very wrong here. > > Removal of something that has been in CAP for YEARS is not a typo. > You have no right to assert that I have not considered them. You practically said as much when you wrote "I was going to oppose ANY AND ALL changes to CAP so that we can get it out.". Thats your direct quote yes? > Your assertion is that it does not meet what you (and others) feel > was what ever the original needs were. If you want to whine and nit pick over the original intent of stored queries then I'll just the attempt. You tacitly agreed to the intent I described in earlier emails and now you are trying to dispute them. Go ahead. If anyone bothers to check previous discussions on stored queries (including the thread of ~Jan/Feb/Mar 2002 where we wanted to simplify the query lingua) they will see you using PDAs and Cell phones as part of the discussion. Stored queries have some use now but they are far short of what we originally intended. The proposal to remove them is still on the table and so far the ONLY objection to it is you; the avowed change opposing editor. > The typos are getting fixed and the word smithing as you called > it are being done because of thousands WG and private emails. Thousands? I somehow doubt it. I know the ones I sent (for CAP-10 mind you) and Ive seen the 2 pages from others in Bugzilla and the list. Are you saying that after 10+ versions (CAP-10 had 4+ versions alone!) we still have "thousands" of typos. Ahh, hehehe. Must be some attempt at levity... > If you have a list of bugs, compatibility issues - please post it. Ive done that 3 times now. If you cant see them then either get glasses or get someone to help you. Bruce =========================================================================== Bruce Kahn INet: [email protected] Messaging & Collaboration Phone: 978.399.6496 IBM Software Group FAX: and nothing but the FAX... Standard disclaimers apply, even where prohibited by law...