Re: CAP-12 - interm version 'A'
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.calendar |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OFEB4635A0.A8B935D2-ON85256D9B.005B97BF-85256D9B.005D90B5@notesdev.ibm.com> |
Doug claimed on 09/05/2003 04:00:23 PM:
> > Then how come not all text was changed like this?
>
> Not done.
They why did you release CAP-12 and CAP-12-a if that change was not done?
> > rules. After all, _that_ RFC uses 2 spaces after a period...
>
> 1) A draft does not obsolete an RFC until it is released.
If you actualy read RFC 2223 then you'd see that it uses 2 spaces after a
period, just like normal English. Guess you ignored that and
misinterpreted that 1 line in the guidelines you cite. Had RFC 2223 meant
for a single space to be used, _it_ would have used them...
> 2) It does look as if that is the new direction.
The only new direction I see is your change. The RFC editors are working
to make it clearer I think by replacing that 1 line in RFC 2223 with the
paragraph that expressly says how spacing should be.
> 3) The draft is at -07 (not -06).
And did that paragraph get removed between -06 and -07?..
So if the RFCs after 2223 have 2 spaces AND RFC 2223 uses 2 spaces after a
period AND the new draft "Instructions for RFC Authors" guidelines the
editorspoint you to (from http://www.rfc-editor.org/policy.html) says:
(7) Spaces at the End of a Sentence
When a sentence ended by a period is immediately followed by
another sentence, there should be two blank spaces after the
period. This rule provides clarity when an RFC is displayed
or printed with a fixed-width font.
I think our draft should follow their guidelines use 2 spaces after a
period.
It would make for a smaller diff than 707 changes so finding actual
content changes would be easier for everyone. Unless you dont want folks
to be able to easily find the changes...
Bruce
===========================================================================
Bruce Kahn INet:
[email protected]
Messaging & Collaboration Phone: 978.399.6496
IBM Software Group FAX: and nothing but the FAX...
Standard disclaimers apply, even where prohibited by law...