Re: CAP-12 - interm version 'A'

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.calendar
Message-ID <OFEB4635A0.A8B935D2-ON85256D9B.005B97BF-85256D9B.005D90B5@notesdev.ibm.com>
Doug claimed on 09/05/2003 04:00:23 PM:
> > Then how come not all text was changed like this? 
> 
> Not done.

They why did you release CAP-12 and CAP-12-a if that change was not done?

> > rules.  After all, _that_ RFC uses 2 spaces after a period...
> 
> 1) A draft does not obsolete an RFC until it is released.

If you actualy read RFC 2223 then you'd see that it uses 2 spaces after a 
period, just like normal English.  Guess you ignored that and 
misinterpreted that 1 line in the guidelines you cite.  Had RFC 2223 meant 
for a single space to be used, _it_ would have used them...

> 2) It does look as if that is the new direction.

The only new direction I see is your change.  The RFC editors are working 
to make it clearer I think by replacing that 1 line in RFC 2223 with the 
paragraph that expressly says how spacing should be.

> 3) The draft is at -07 (not -06).

And did that paragraph get removed between -06 and -07?.. 

So if the RFCs after 2223 have 2 spaces AND RFC 2223 uses 2 spaces after a 
period AND the new draft  "Instructions for RFC Authors" guidelines the 
editorspoint you to (from http://www.rfc-editor.org/policy.html) says:

       (7) Spaces at the End of a Sentence

          When a sentence ended by a period is immediately followed by
          another sentence, there should be two blank spaces after the
          period.  This rule provides clarity when an RFC is displayed
          or printed with a fixed-width font. 

I think our draft should follow their guidelines use 2 spaces after a 
period.

It would make for a smaller diff than 707 changes so finding actual 
content changes would be easier for everyone.  Unless you dont want folks 
to be able to easily find the changes...

Bruce
===========================================================================
Bruce Kahn                                INet: 
[email protected]
Messaging & Collaboration                 Phone: 978.399.6496
IBM Software Group                         FAX: and nothing but the FAX...
Standard disclaimers apply, even where prohibited by law...
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.