Re: [Fwd: CAP-12 - interm version 'A']
Mark Smith <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.calendar |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Nathaniel Borenstein wrote: > > What Mark did simply proved that it is possible to do what Bruce had > asked for. It is silly for more than one person to have to do this, > and I always understood this to be a part of the job of the document > editor. When I read a draft after reading some previous version of the draft I do a diff. I do not know of any other IETF list that has produced diffs of draft versions. I also can not find a list of differences for versions of any draft except the ones that Doug used to publish. Check for yourself. I could not find any. The process seems to be that there is debate then at random times a new version shows up. I have looked in several IETF lists and web pages and I think you have been misled by someone on this list that is making more false statements or is just trying to disrupt this list. It does not seem to be normal process. There also seems to be a lack of chair participation on this list. It is very hard to find any consensus called even when there is a overwhelming agreement. > BTW the whole problem can be simplified a bit if the editor uses a tool > like xml2rfc and produces diffs using the relevant component files... If you noticed he also published the XML source on calsch.org and his web site. And again I could not find any XML diffs published. Do you know of any? Mark