Re: Restore iTIP Functionality

I strongly agree with your. It is my understanding the WG wanted it out.



Craig Johnson wrote:

> Before CAP-12, it was possible for a CUA to obtain 'UNPROCESSED' 
> VFREEBUSY components from the Calendar Store.  Now, however, a 
> new section in CAP-12 explicitly prohibits this (Section 10.12.1, 
> paragraph 4):
>  
>    If a CUA searches for "VFREEBUSY" components with STATE() =
>    'UNPROCESSED', such a CS MUST return a "VREPLY" with no components.
>  
> This undermines iTIP functionality for the VFREEBUSY component; 
> it disallows a CUA from participating in iTIP based free-busy requests 
> and responses.  It also conflicts with other provisions in CAP that 
> indicate iTIP is unaffected and fully supported.  We believe this 
> restriction must be removed to restore iTIP functionality and 
> consistency to CAP.
>  
> C. Johnson


-- 

 Doug Royer                     |   http://INET-Consulting.com 
 -------------------------------|-----------------------------
 [email protected]                 | Office: (208)612-INET
 http://Royer.com/People/Doug   |    Fax: (866)594-8574
                                |   Cell: (208)520-4044

                We Do Standards - You Need Standards