Re: CAP-12

On Wednesday, October 22, 2003, at 09:50 PM, Doug Royer wrote:

>
> I have finished editing in the typos sent to me and the list.

a typo I found:
MODIFY command section -> "one ore more" should be "one or more"


> I have clarified the paragraphs that were sent to this list.
>
> The only open proposal is Bruce's proposal to break modify with
> no proposed solution which I do not see as having any support.
> Bruce's proposal at this time would need to have consensus
> called by the chairs to make that kind of  changes.
>
> There are no more action items.
>
> I will post -12 to the IETF tomorrow if there are no more items posted.

I have a more general issue which is not real technical, but more 
editorial/
clarifying.

In the section 10.1 Cap Commands.

For all commands the formal definition of a command is given, but not
for the associated request. This is in contrast to the responses which
are provided.

For a command the document only provides the CMD line defnition and the
parameters allow in this CMD line.
For the response the document specifies the complete
'BEGIN:VCALENDAR ..... END:VCALENDER' definition. And my impression is
that, for instance, the modify command does this half way.

OK, one can derive things from the examples, but that is not wished for 
I guess.

harrie