Re: CAP-12-e: CAP-VERSION Property

[email protected] wrote:

>
> Doug replied on 11/03/2003 04:42:26 PM:
> > > 1: Is there a reason CAP-VERSION is not defined like VERSION is in
> > > iCalendar?
> >
> > It is a multivalued field unlike VERSION. So you could say you are RFC
> > X, and Z compatible
> > skipping Y if needed.
>
> My appologies for not be more precise in the question.  I was 
> referring to using a numeric values like VERSION (which actually is 
> biparted):


Do you have a proposal? It does not look like it to me.

-- 

Doug Royer                     |   http://INET-Consulting.com
-------------------------------|-----------------------------
[email protected]                 | Office: (208)520-4044
http://Royer.com/People/Doug   |    Fax: (866)594-8574
                               |   Cell: (208)520-4044

               We Do Standards - You Need Standards