Re: different calendar scales

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.calendar
Message-ID <OF7F9C38A3.AA4E0791-ON85256DD4.0076A6BD-85256DD4.0077273F@egenconsulting.com>
As I have said before, everyone, including you, Mr. Smith, should respond 
to this list with constructive comments only.  I'm really very tired of 
the way this list has turned into a series of nastygrams.  I continue to 
get private notes from people saying they no longer particpate on the list 
because of the tone of many of the notes.  Therefore, I want everyone - 
Doug, Mark, Bruce - everyone - to keep notes to calendaring topics.  If it 
continues, I will go back to the IETF management and ask them to remove 
people from our lists.  That's a promise.




Mark Smith <[email protected]> 
Sent by: [email protected]
11/04/2003 13:52

To
[email protected]
cc

Subject
Re: different calendar scales







[email protected] wrote:
> 
> John replied on 11/03/2003 04:17:52 PM:
> > I think, if we ever get non-Gregorian scales, we'll have to mandate
> that
> > all iCalendar implementations support Gregorian, for interop with
> > existing implementations.
> 
> That defeats the purpose of having CALSCALE in the entity doesnt it?

The original proposal was the CAPABILITY reply be extended. Please
read all of the posts before replying with more underinformed comments.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.