Re: different calendar scales

[email protected] wrote:
> 
> As I have said before, everyone, including you, Mr. Smith, should
> respond to this list with constructive comments only.  I'm really very
> tired of the way this list has turned into a series of nastygrams.  I
> continue to get private notes from people saying they no longer
> particpate on the list because of the tone of many of the notes.
>  Therefore, I want everyone - Doug, Mark, Bruce - everyone - to keep
> notes to calendaring topics.  If it continues, I will go back to the
> IETF management and ask them to remove people from our lists.  That's
> a promise.

Remove me if you want, but Bruce's inaccurate posts and your lack
of willingness to act is killing CAP.  You let him ramble on and
on and on about items that have been in the draft for years without
ever calling consensus. That's not Bruce's or Doug's fault - please act.

You seem to be unwilling or unable to make technical decisions. Just
because Bruce posts does not mean that he is right or accurate. He
almost never posts a proposal and almost never responds to questions
and declares that others misunderstand him. And you seem to be unwilling
or unable to notice.

You asked me in private email if I worked for Doug which I found
insulting.
Do you work for Bruce or are you affiliated with Bruce or his company?
What is you motive for allowing Bruce to post inaccurate information
over and over again and then complain when someone calls Bruce on it?

Looking over the archives I can only find a small handful of times
that you called consensus on anything.  No wonder CAP is not finished.

Doug send me private email about a commercial calendar consortium that
you
and someone else are forming wanting to know if I knew or wanted
to participate (as Doug's company runs our calendar servers). Is that
your motive for not acting on CAP? Did you bother telling this list that
you have commercial motives that may keep you from being impartial?