Fw: different calendar scales
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.calendar |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OFD94BCAF6.72D5DB68-ON85256DD5.00175186-85256DD5.00176C06@egenconsulting.com> |
First, my apologies to the list for forgetting to cc: all recipients on the original note. And second, my apologies to the list for this flurry of less-than-productive emails. Hopefully, they will stop soon.... ___________________ Patricia Egen Consulting www.egenconsulting.com 423-875-2652 ----- Forwarded by Pat R Egen/Egen Consulting/01 on 11/04/2003 23:14 ----- Pat R Egen/Egen Consulting/01 11/04/2003 23:14 To Mark Smith <[email protected]> cc Subject Re: different calendar scales You have your opinion. That's what makes this a great world. We all can have opinions. As to my relationship with Bruce. He is my friend. I have no other relationship other than that and the fact I have always found him to be a kind person with a lot of enthusiam. Sometimes, his enthusiam is intense. But, then, isn't that true of all of us who are passionate about what we feel is important. Whenever Bruce has been able to attend our IETF meetings, he brings us back into focus. He hounds at the topic until both he and the rest of us "get it." Bob and I miss it when he's not able to participate at the meetings or on the list. That's why we lobbyed for him to be the Method Reviewer of RFC2445 2446 and 2447. We know he would keep us honest. As for the last year, and no valid comments. Yes, indeed, that is very true. Especially since it has been nearly impossible to figure out what is concensus and what is not. It really started in March after the San Francisco meeting. Nothing like making a last call to bring out the best of us...... ___________________ Patricia Egen Consulting www.egenconsulting.com 423-875-2652 Mark Smith <[email protected]> Sent by: [email protected] 11/04/2003 21:45 To [email protected] cc Subject Re: different calendar scales [email protected] wrote: > Or, better yet, get another, tougher skinned, working group > chair. I would vote for that, I can not find ONE constructive comment or item you have posted in the last year. I can not find that you called conciseness on anything in the last year even when no one objected to a proposal. So, what is your relationship to Bruce/company? I found it odd when researching the archives that you seem to back Bruces inaccurate posts and complain that those who call him on it are less than professional.