Re: CAP-12-e: CAP-VERSION Property
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.calendar |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OF999D61AC.E27D6980-ON85256DD5.00505C10-85256DD5.00532647@notesdev.ibm.com> |
Doug replied on 11/04/2003 02:16:01 PM: > > My appologies for not be more precise in the question. I was > > referring to using a numeric values like VERSION (which actually is > > biparted): > > Do you have a proposal? It does not look like it to me. I clearly indicated that it was a question, not something that required a proposal to resolve. By your constant avoidance to the question Ill have to assume that you made the change arbitrarily without WG discussion or concensus by virtue of being the sole current editor. If Im wrong then fine but I can find no WG discussion on the changes that Im asking about or the questionable ABNF I find. As recent as April 2003 it was described one way and all of a sudden in June 2003 it was different. Since you have said (in part but not out of context): It is a multivalued field... I think its fair to question the non-multivalued ABNF that is currently there. In case you were not aware, the current ABNF does NOT indicate that CAP-VERSION is multivalued. It is just: cap-version = "CAP-VERSION" other-params ":" text CRLF which means CAP-VERSION is single valued; a single 'text' value. If you want to see an example of a multivalued ABNF then check out my provided ABNF or the one in Section 8.22 MULTIPART Property name = "MULTIPART" other-params ":" text *( "," text) CRLF Bruce =========================================================================== Bruce Kahn INet: [email protected] Messaging & Collaboration Phone: 978.399.6496 IBM Software Group FAX: and nothing but the FAX... Standard disclaimers apply, even where prohibited by law...