Re: When to publish -12 - VFREEBUSY

Doug Royer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.calendar
Organization http://INET-Consulting.com
Message-ID <[email protected]>

Craig Johnson wrote:

> Doug responded:
>
> > CJohnson Wrote
> >> !!! The WG standard for making a request for free-busy time is with
> >> the VFREEBUSY object. !!! RFC 2445, p. 58:
> >
> >It does and in -exactlyt- the same way - by the CUA and we added by 
> the CS.
> I wish Doug were correct. But CAP-12e has no provision that permits
> the CUA to make a free-busy request using the VFREEBUSY component
> and get a direct response.

Nor does iTIP - it has to be processed by the CUA - correct?
Currently the only way to send a message is iMIP, that does not
generate an auto reply unless your MTA has a CUA built into it.

> — It's not in Section 10.12.1. That section attempts to define how to get
> VFREEBUSY components using a VQUERY.
> — It's not done using iTIP (CMD:CREATE, METHOD:REQUEST). All [iTIP]
> messages are deposited in the CS in the UNPROCESSED state. The CUA
> simply gets a "success" response. (Section 10.4).

Which is exactly how iMIP does it to your mailbox to later be
processed by your CUA - correct?

-- 

Doug Royer                     |   http://INET-Consulting.com
-------------------------------|-----------------------------
[email protected]                 | Office: (208)520-4044
http://Royer.com/People/Doug   |    Fax: (866)594-8574
                               |   Cell: (208)520-4044

               We Do Standards - You Need Standards
smime.p7s (application/x-pkcs7-signature, 4.6 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.