Re: When to publish -12 - VFREEBUSY
Doug Royer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.calendar |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://INET-Consulting.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Craig Johnson wrote: > Doug responded: > > > CJohnson Wrote > >> !!! The WG standard for making a request for free-busy time is with > >> the VFREEBUSY object. !!! RFC 2445, p. 58: > > > >It does and in -exactlyt- the same way - by the CUA and we added by > the CS. > I wish Doug were correct. But CAP-12e has no provision that permits > the CUA to make a free-busy request using the VFREEBUSY component > and get a direct response. Nor does iTIP - it has to be processed by the CUA - correct? Currently the only way to send a message is iMIP, that does not generate an auto reply unless your MTA has a CUA built into it. > — It's not in Section 10.12.1. That section attempts to define how to get > VFREEBUSY components using a VQUERY. > — It's not done using iTIP (CMD:CREATE, METHOD:REQUEST). All [iTIP] > messages are deposited in the CS in the UNPROCESSED state. The CUA > simply gets a "success" response. (Section 10.4). Which is exactly how iMIP does it to your mailbox to later be processed by your CUA - correct? -- Doug Royer | http://INET-Consulting.com -------------------------------|----------------------------- [email protected] | Office: (208)520-4044 http://Royer.com/People/Doug | Fax: (866)594-8574 | Cell: (208)520-4044 We Do Standards - You Need Standards
smime.p7s
(application/x-pkcs7-signature, 4.6 KB) - not displayed