Alarms/SEQUENCE (was Re: Status of the CALSCH working group)
Nathaniel Borenstein <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.calendar |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Friday, November 7, 2003, at 04:14 PM, Doug Royer wrote: >> Alarms/SEQUENCE -- I remain confused: Can there be two identical >> objects in the same calendar? If not, we should clearly say so. > > You can and iCAL has no such restriction on any component including > VALARMs. > Currently all components have a unique identifier within their context > of usage. > Some want no unique identifier, and their stated reasons specifically > ignores the > identical components issue. But what does this mean? If you store two identical items in your database without any unique identifiers, how can a client ever choose one over the other? I'm having a hard time seeing how this is a good idea. -- Nathaniel