Alarms/SEQUENCE (was Re: Status of the CALSCH working group)

Nathaniel Borenstein <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.calendar
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Friday, November 7, 2003, at 04:14  PM, Doug Royer wrote:

>> Alarms/SEQUENCE -- I remain confused: Can there be two identical 
>> objects in the same calendar? If not, we should clearly say so.
>
> You can and iCAL has no such restriction on any component including 
> VALARMs.
> Currently all components have a unique identifier within their context 
> of usage.
> Some want no unique identifier, and their stated reasons specifically 
> ignores the
> identical components issue.

But what does this mean?  If you store two identical items in your 
database without any unique identifiers, how can a client ever choose 
one over the other?  I'm having a hard time seeing how this is a good 
idea.  -- Nathaniel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.