Re: Alarms/SEQUENCE (was Re: Status of the CALSCH working group)
Mark Smith <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.calendar |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Nathaniel Borenstein wrote: > > On Friday, November 7, 2003, at 04:14 PM, Doug Royer wrote: > > Alarms/SEQUENCE -- I remain confused: Can there be two identical objects in the same calendar? If not, we should clearly say so. > > You can and iCAL has no such restriction on any component including VALARMs. > Currently all components have a unique identifier within their context of usage. > Some want no unique identifier, and their stated reasons specifically ignores the > identical components issue. > > But what does this mean? If you store two identical items in your database > without any unique identifiers, how can a client ever choose one over > the other? I'm having a hard time seeing how this is a good idea. -- Nathaniel On my PDA the default entry is audio alarm. I have often accidentally created two audio alarms when I really wanted one audio and one pager (email) alarm. Then had to go back and fix them later when the two alarms go off which when I notice that I made the mistake. If CAP did not allow me to fixed them I have to throw away the entire VEVENT and start over? I hope not. VALARMS need a unique identifier. Think about it, the topic is why would you need to uniquely identify a VALARM in a MODIFY command. One answer is to fix a problem.