Re: Status of the CALSCH working group

Mark Smith <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.calendar
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
[email protected] wrote:

> 
> We have never drawn a distinction between a CUs availability or a
> calendars before.  Are you saying you have some proposal in mind for
> drawing a distinction?  Something like hierarchical calendars with
> busytime / content rollup or "calendar bundling"?  Please say no...

So what - what he said is still true. Currently MANY systems
PUBLISH freebusy, including the big vendor - please say you
do not want to break them!!!
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.