Re: Status of the CALSCH working group (Alarms/SEQUENCE)

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.calendar
Message-ID <OF89035B40.71F5FA91-ON85256DDA.0078E5A5-85256DDA.0079953C@notesdev.ibm.com>
Mark blasted away on 11/10/2003 03:09:48 PM:
> What does that have to do with the topic or the email asked or answered?
> Nothing at all.
> 
> Do you even follow the topics before posting?

Normally I would not respond to this kind of trolling but Ill give you the 
benefit of the doubt and chalk this up to ignorance rather than malice. 
Nathaniel wrote:

Alarms/SEQUENCE -- I remain confused: Can there be two identical 
objects in the same calendar? If not, we should clearly say so.

to which Doug replied:

You can and iCAL has no such restriction on any component including 
VALARMs.

to which I pointed out that he was incorrect.  iCalendar has at least 5 
places where it says duplicates are to be treated as a single instance.  I 
then pointed out that CAP also has text to this effect.  So my reply was 
on topic just like the last time you said it wasnt.

Bruce
===========================================================================
Bruce Kahn                                INet: 
[email protected]
Messaging & Collaboration                 Phone: 978.399.6496
IBM Software Group                         FAX: and nothing but the FAX...
Standard disclaimers apply, even where prohibited by law...
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.