Re: Status of the CALSCH working group (Alarms/SEQUENCE)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.calendar |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OF89035B40.71F5FA91-ON85256DDA.0078E5A5-85256DDA.0079953C@notesdev.ibm.com> |
Mark blasted away on 11/10/2003 03:09:48 PM: > What does that have to do with the topic or the email asked or answered? > Nothing at all. > > Do you even follow the topics before posting? Normally I would not respond to this kind of trolling but Ill give you the benefit of the doubt and chalk this up to ignorance rather than malice. Nathaniel wrote: Alarms/SEQUENCE -- I remain confused: Can there be two identical objects in the same calendar? If not, we should clearly say so. to which Doug replied: You can and iCAL has no such restriction on any component including VALARMs. to which I pointed out that he was incorrect. iCalendar has at least 5 places where it says duplicates are to be treated as a single instance. I then pointed out that CAP also has text to this effect. So my reply was on topic just like the last time you said it wasnt. Bruce =========================================================================== Bruce Kahn INet: [email protected] Messaging & Collaboration Phone: 978.399.6496 IBM Software Group FAX: and nothing but the FAX... Standard disclaimers apply, even where prohibited by law...