Re: Thick skinned chairs (Was Re: different calendar scales)

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.calendar
Message-ID <OF5EDE2541.2156493B-ON85256DDB.005617FE-85256DDB.00576F7A@notesdev.ibm.com>
Doug replied on 11/10/2003 06:43:35 PM:
> > Im sure the ADs would agree with this assessment too.  While its 
> > helpful for chairs to be more engaged at times, there should never be 
> > a need for them to be thick skinned to in order to handle abuse from 
> > unruly or quarrelsome WG participants.
> 
> I feel you also fall into that category. 

Thats your perogative.  However, dont confuse persistance on issues with 
abuse of chairs when they disagree with you.  I have NOT verbally abused 
or acosted the chairs like others here. 

>                                          You have posted several items 
> that had already
> been fixed in CAP then tended to imply that no one was listening or 
> responding to you.

Both of us have been in some heated discussions here as most everyone can 
tell.  If the questions asked/rasied have been answered then it should 
just be a simple matter to refer to the proper WG thread where it was 
covered and resolved.  That is, if it was actually discussed and resolved. 
 If not, asking again is still a valid option.

Whenever I missed something and it was pointed out to me, I acknowledged 
that publically (ie: searching for busytime text in 10.12.1).  However 
that does not mean questions about it cannot be raised.  Especially since 
the design and text were the product of one person and not the WG at 
large.

> And your mode seems to be an expectation that I respond to you each and 
> every time you
> ask a question even when it is a loaded or an out of date question. I 
> nor this WG report
> to Bruce as we are all volunteers on this list with our own jobs.

As Editor you should be able to answer questions about content of the 
draft, especially the intent of text.  If you are unable or unwilling then 
we should get a co-editor or replacement editor who can or is at least 
willing to try. 

Bruce
===========================================================================
Bruce Kahn                                INet: 
[email protected]
Messaging & Collaboration                 Phone: 978.399.6496
IBM Software Group                         FAX: and nothing but the FAX...
Standard disclaimers apply, even where prohibited by law...
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.