Re: Clarification for Free/Busy

Anil SRIVASTAVA <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.calendar
Organization Sun ONE Software - a division of Sun Microsystems Inc [http://www.sun.com/software]
Message-ID <Pine.WNT.4.58.0311242228510.6080@nikita>
Ah.. the tabs did not do the trick :-); Tim.  I have recreated the
table.  Correct me if it does not look like the way you intended it to
be.

>                 |  STATUS of VEVENT
>                 |
>VEVENT in period | TENTATIVE      | CONFIRMED        | CANCELLED | not there
>and TRANSP       |                |                  |           |
>=================|=====================================================
>No / (none)      | FREE           | FREE             | FREE      | FREE
>Yes/ OPAQUE      | BUSY-TENTATIVE | BUSY-UNAVAILABLE | FREE      | BUSY
>Yes/ TRANSPARENT | FREE           | FREE             | FREE      | FREE
>
>Notice the last line is all "FREE" - this is because TRANSPARENT is
>explicitly identified as being transparent to free-busy searches.

A clarification: by the last 'not there' column you mean an event where
the attendee has 'declined' the invitation, ie. their PARTSTAT in that
event says 'DECLINED'

Anil

On 2003-11-24/23:10 [-0500], [email protected] [Tim Hare] wrote:

> One mapping that makes sense to me in my reading of RFC 2445 (others might disagree) -
> hope the tabs format this correctly:
>
>                                         |  STATUS of
> VEVENT                             |
>  VEVENT in period       | TENTATIVE             | CONFIRMED             |
> CANCELLED     | not there
>  abd
> TRANSP             |                       |                       |               |
>  ===============        |=================      |=================      |===========    |=====
> =====
>  No  / (none)                   | FREE                  | FREE                  |
> FREE          | FREE
>  Yes/ OPAQUE    | BUSY-TENTATIVE        | BUSY-UNAVAILABLE      | FREE          | BUSY
>  Yes/ TRANSPARENT       | FREE                  | FREE                  |
> FREE          | FREE
>
> Notice the last line is all "FREE" - this is because TRANSPARENT is explicitly
> identified as being transparent to free-busy searches.
>
> Tim Hare
> Interested Bystander, Non-Inc.
>
>
> At 09:52 AM 11/24/03 -0800, you wrote:
>       I am hoping that someone can clarify how to map from a VEVENT component's
>       properties to what should be returned for a Free/Busy request.
>        
>       RFC 2445 states unambiguously that TRANSP is the property that is to be
>       used to return Free/Busy status. From "4.8.2.7 Time Transparency":
>        
>       Description: Time Transparency is the characteristic of an event that
>           determines whether it appears to consume time on a calendar. Events
>           that consume actual time for the individual or resource associated
>           with the calendar SHOULD be recorded as OPAQUE, allowing them to be
>           detected by free-busy time searches. Other events, which do not take
>           up the individual's (or resource's) time SHOULD be recorded as
>           TRANSPARENT, making them invisible to free-busy time searches.
>        
>
>       This seems clear until I read the description of the free busy time type
>       parameter, FBTYPE (a parameter of FREEBUSY, which is a property of a
>       VFREEBUSY component). From "4.2.9 Free/Busy Time Type" (fbtype):
>        
>       Description: The parameter specifies the free or busy time type. The
>           value FREE indicates that the time interval is free for scheduling.
>           The value BUSY indicates that the time interval is busy because one
>           or more events have been scheduled for that interval. The value
>           BUSY-UNAVAILABLE indicates that the time interval is busy and that
>           the interval can not be scheduled. The value BUSY-TENTATIVE indicates
>           that the time interval is busy because one or more events have been
>           tentatively scheduled for that interval. If not specified on a
>           property that allows this parameter, the default is BUSY.
>        
>       The above clearly states that there are four (4) levels of free/busy:
>        
>       FREE
>       BUSY
>       BUSY-UNAVAILABLE
>       BUSY-TENTATIVE
>        
>       What I'm missing is a way to map from an Event's TRANSP property which has
>       only two states (FREE or BUSY) to these four states.
>        
>       Is the intention that free/busy should be reported by combining TRANSP with
>       some other property or properties? If I just look at the value "tentative",
>       I see that there are actually two places in an Event where I could
>       potentially derive that value: PARTSTAT and STATUS. I don't see any
>       explicit instruction in RFC 2445 for this.
>        
>       Let me rephrase this a bit in the hope of getting a more exact answer. And
>       instead of looking at a VEVENT and deciding what the FBTYPE should be, can
>       we look at what the desired FBTYPE is and work backwards?
>        
>       What does the VEVENT look like that would generate, for example, the
>       following property in a VFREEBUSY component:
>        
>       FREEBUSY;FBTYPE=BUSY-TENTATIVE:20031201T130000Z/20031201T140000Z
>        
>       or to get even more explicit let's take several cases:
>        
>       1. An attendee has been invited to an event and replied with a tentative
>       acceptance. What does the Attendee's copy of that VEVENT look like in order
>       to return
>        FREEBUSY;FBTYPE=BUSY-TENTATIVE: <dates >
>        
>       2. An attendee has been invited to an event and replied with a decline. If
>       the attendee retains that event (maybe he want to be able to change his
>       mind later?), what does his copy of that VEVENT look like? I assume that he
>       should report that timeslot as being "FREE":
>        FREEBUSY;FBTYPE=FREE: <dates >
>        
>       3. An attendee has been invited to an event and replied with an acceptance.
>       The organizer has then canceled the event, but the Attendee retains a copy
>       (for whatever reason). What does the Attendee's copy of that VEVENT look
>       like in order to return
>        FREEBUSY;FBTYPE=FREE: <dates >
>        
>       4. What does anyone's (organizer or attendee) VEVENT copy look like to
>       generate:
>        FREEBUSY;FBTYPE=BUSY-UNAVAILABLE: <dates >
>        
>
>       In case it's not clear, I'm looking for someone to help me out by telling
>       me that the associated VEVENT would look like:
>        
>       TRANSP: <value >
>       STATUS: <value >
>       ATTENDEE: <whatever >
>        
>       or any appropriate fields and values that are involved.
>        
>        
>       I'd appreciate any help the list can give.
>        
>        
>
>        
>
>
>

-- 
__________
Anil SRIVASTAVA
[email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.