Re: Clarification for Free/Busy
Anil SRIVASTAVA <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.calendar |
|---|---|
| Organization | Sun ONE Software - a division of Sun Microsystems Inc [http://www.sun.com/software] |
| Message-ID | <Pine.WNT.4.58.0311242228510.6080@nikita> |
Ah.. the tabs did not do the trick :-); Tim. I have recreated the table. Correct me if it does not look like the way you intended it to be. > | STATUS of VEVENT > | >VEVENT in period | TENTATIVE | CONFIRMED | CANCELLED | not there >and TRANSP | | | | >=================|===================================================== >No / (none) | FREE | FREE | FREE | FREE >Yes/ OPAQUE | BUSY-TENTATIVE | BUSY-UNAVAILABLE | FREE | BUSY >Yes/ TRANSPARENT | FREE | FREE | FREE | FREE > >Notice the last line is all "FREE" - this is because TRANSPARENT is >explicitly identified as being transparent to free-busy searches. A clarification: by the last 'not there' column you mean an event where the attendee has 'declined' the invitation, ie. their PARTSTAT in that event says 'DECLINED' Anil On 2003-11-24/23:10 [-0500], [email protected] [Tim Hare] wrote: > One mapping that makes sense to me in my reading of RFC 2445 (others might disagree) - > hope the tabs format this correctly: > > | STATUS of > VEVENT | > VEVENT in period | TENTATIVE | CONFIRMED | > CANCELLED | not there > abd > TRANSP | | | | > =============== |================= |================= |=========== |===== > ===== > No / (none) | FREE | FREE | > FREE | FREE > Yes/ OPAQUE | BUSY-TENTATIVE | BUSY-UNAVAILABLE | FREE | BUSY > Yes/ TRANSPARENT | FREE | FREE | > FREE | FREE > > Notice the last line is all "FREE" - this is because TRANSPARENT is explicitly > identified as being transparent to free-busy searches. > > Tim Hare > Interested Bystander, Non-Inc. > > > At 09:52 AM 11/24/03 -0800, you wrote: > I am hoping that someone can clarify how to map from a VEVENT component's > properties to what should be returned for a Free/Busy request. > > RFC 2445 states unambiguously that TRANSP is the property that is to be > used to return Free/Busy status. From "4.8.2.7 Time Transparency": > > Description: Time Transparency is the characteristic of an event that > determines whether it appears to consume time on a calendar. Events > that consume actual time for the individual or resource associated > with the calendar SHOULD be recorded as OPAQUE, allowing them to be > detected by free-busy time searches. Other events, which do not take > up the individual's (or resource's) time SHOULD be recorded as > TRANSPARENT, making them invisible to free-busy time searches. > > > This seems clear until I read the description of the free busy time type > parameter, FBTYPE (a parameter of FREEBUSY, which is a property of a > VFREEBUSY component). From "4.2.9 Free/Busy Time Type" (fbtype): > > Description: The parameter specifies the free or busy time type. The > value FREE indicates that the time interval is free for scheduling. > The value BUSY indicates that the time interval is busy because one > or more events have been scheduled for that interval. The value > BUSY-UNAVAILABLE indicates that the time interval is busy and that > the interval can not be scheduled. The value BUSY-TENTATIVE indicates > that the time interval is busy because one or more events have been > tentatively scheduled for that interval. If not specified on a > property that allows this parameter, the default is BUSY. > > The above clearly states that there are four (4) levels of free/busy: > > FREE > BUSY > BUSY-UNAVAILABLE > BUSY-TENTATIVE > > What I'm missing is a way to map from an Event's TRANSP property which has > only two states (FREE or BUSY) to these four states. > > Is the intention that free/busy should be reported by combining TRANSP with > some other property or properties? If I just look at the value "tentative", > I see that there are actually two places in an Event where I could > potentially derive that value: PARTSTAT and STATUS. I don't see any > explicit instruction in RFC 2445 for this. > > Let me rephrase this a bit in the hope of getting a more exact answer. And > instead of looking at a VEVENT and deciding what the FBTYPE should be, can > we look at what the desired FBTYPE is and work backwards? > > What does the VEVENT look like that would generate, for example, the > following property in a VFREEBUSY component: > > FREEBUSY;FBTYPE=BUSY-TENTATIVE:20031201T130000Z/20031201T140000Z > > or to get even more explicit let's take several cases: > > 1. An attendee has been invited to an event and replied with a tentative > acceptance. What does the Attendee's copy of that VEVENT look like in order > to return > FREEBUSY;FBTYPE=BUSY-TENTATIVE: <dates > > > 2. An attendee has been invited to an event and replied with a decline. If > the attendee retains that event (maybe he want to be able to change his > mind later?), what does his copy of that VEVENT look like? I assume that he > should report that timeslot as being "FREE": > FREEBUSY;FBTYPE=FREE: <dates > > > 3. An attendee has been invited to an event and replied with an acceptance. > The organizer has then canceled the event, but the Attendee retains a copy > (for whatever reason). What does the Attendee's copy of that VEVENT look > like in order to return > FREEBUSY;FBTYPE=FREE: <dates > > > 4. What does anyone's (organizer or attendee) VEVENT copy look like to > generate: > FREEBUSY;FBTYPE=BUSY-UNAVAILABLE: <dates > > > > In case it's not clear, I'm looking for someone to help me out by telling > me that the associated VEVENT would look like: > > TRANSP: <value > > STATUS: <value > > ATTENDEE: <whatever > > > or any appropriate fields and values that are involved. > > > I'd appreciate any help the list can give. > > > > > > > -- __________ Anil SRIVASTAVA [email protected]