Re: Clarification for Free/Busy (CAP-auto-generate only?)

These discussions seem to presume the process can always be automated. A 
CU could
wish for the time to be BUSY in case they change their mind later. In 
which case the
CU would want the time to be BUSY even if declined.

The publishing of static VFREEBUSY information is a valid RFC-2446 thing 
to do, and it can
be independent of the CAP/BOOKED auto generated VFREEBUSY discussion.

So unless we are deprecating RFC-2446 VFREEBUSY/PUBLISH (and please no), 
then
I assume these discussions are assuming CAP auto generated VFREEBUSY BOOKED
replies?


Anil SRIVASTAVA wrote:

>That makes sense.  Still no feedback on if an attendee has declined an
>invitation.  I am assuming that would mean FREE, regardless of the value
>of TRANSP.
>
>On 2003-11-25/10:57 [-0500], [email protected] [Dan Winship] wrote:
>
>  
>
>>    
>>
>
>  
>

-- 

Doug Royer                     |   http://INET-Consulting.com
-------------------------------|-----------------------------
[email protected]                 | Office: (208)520-4044
http://Royer.com/People/Doug   |    Fax: (866)594-8574
                               |   Cell: (208)520-4044

               We Do Standards - You Need Standards