Re: Clarification for Free/Busy (CAP-auto-generate only?)

On 2003-11-25/12:55 [-0700], [email protected] [Doug Royer] wrote:

>
> These discussions seem to presume the process can always be automated.
> A CU could wish for the time to be BUSY in case they change their mind
> later. In which case the CU would want the time to be BUSY even if
> declined.
>
> The publishing of static VFREEBUSY information is a valid RFC-2446
> thing to do, and it can be independent of the CAP/BOOKED auto
> generated VFREEBUSY discussion.
>
> So unless we are deprecating RFC-2446 VFREEBUSY/PUBLISH (and please
> no), then I assume these discussions are assuming CAP auto generated
> VFREEBUSY BOOKED replies?
>
>

Yes.

> Anil SRIVASTAVA wrote:
>
> >That makes sense.  Still no feedback on if an attendee has declined an
> >invitation.  I am assuming that would mean FREE, regardless of the value
> >of TRANSP.
> >
> >On 2003-11-25/10:57 [-0500], [email protected] [Dan Winship] wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>

-- 
__________
Anil SRIVASTAVA
[email protected]