RE: Clarification for Free/Busy

Satyanarayana Vempati <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.calendar
Message-ID <[email protected]>
In a group scheduled calendar component, the STATUS property is
used by the "Organizer" to provide a confirmation of the event to the
"Attendees".

Shouldn't PARTSTAT also be taken into account for an attendee's
calendar?

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dan Winship
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 7:57 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Tim Hare; [email protected]
Subject: Re: Clarification for Free/Busy


> >                 |  STATUS of VEVENT
> >                 |
> >VEVENT in period | TENTATIVE      | CONFIRMED        | CANCELLED |
not there
> >and TRANSP       |                |                  |           |
>
>=================|=====================================================
> >No / (none)      | FREE           | FREE             | FREE      |
FREE
> >Yes/ OPAQUE      | BUSY-TENTATIVE | BUSY-UNAVAILABLE | FREE      |
BUSY
> >Yes/ TRANSPARENT | FREE           | FREE             | FREE      |
FREE

RFC 2445 says "The value BUSY indicates that the time interval is busy
because one or more events have been scheduled for that interval.
BUSY-UNAVAILABLE indicates that the time interval is busy and that the
interval can not be scheduled." So OPAQUE+CONFIRMED is BUSY, not
BUSY-UNAVAILABLE, since the interval has been scheduled. 

BUSY-UNAVAILABLE is like "I'm on vacation during this period" or "This
is a holiday" or "These hours are outside my work day". (Assuming a
work-related calendar.)

-- Dan
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.