Re: an idea as an alternative to stored queries
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.calendar |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OF66D6C591.9D719192-ON85256DEF.005AA3B6-85256DEF.005B19A1@notesdev.ibm.com> |
Doug replied on 11/28/2003 03:20:58 PM: > Ether the CUA knew what XXX > did or not. Ether you were allowed (by VCAR like any other > component) to modify it, remove it, add one, or not. You neglect to take into account that a CU may use different CUAs and each may have their own expectation of what XXX does depending on who coded them (or if XXX was changed by a different CUA or other means). As such, just because CUA-1 'knows' that XXX performs a particular action does not mean it will always be so and unless CUA-1 can retrieve and confirm this by existing means then a change by CUA-2 may different behaviour for the same CU depending on what CUA they are using. For example, your PDA may have one expecation while your desktop CUA may have another. This is not goodness. So if CUAs are coded to rely on things they cannot retrieve and look at using CAP such as unencodable in CAP actions or queries then this expecation that the CUA 'knows' what XXX does is fundamentally flawed and bad. Bruce =========================================================================== Bruce Kahn INet: [email protected] Messaging & Collaboration Phone: 978.399.6496 IBM Software Group FAX: and nothing but the FAX... Standard disclaimers apply, even where prohibited by law...