Re: DTSTART for recurrence instances
"Michael Fair" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.calendar |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Mark Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > > Michael Fair wrote: > > He said 'master' introduces a new term. No it did not. Do you have a differing or counter definition for the term 'master' or do you simply have a personal gripe with posts initiating from Bruce? In the context of Craig's post, Bruce found the use of the term master sloppy and called it a new term. He might have been mistaken about that (people make mistakes), but he offered us the definition of 'master' that he was going to use for the context of that email. The appropriate response to that would have been to cite the definition of the term 'master' from iTip _AND_ cite whether or not you agreed that Craig's use of the term 'master' followed with Bruce's definition. Instead you simply called Bruce a liar and made a passing reference to iTip thereby making us all duplicate the lookup work and reread the posts to see if the usage was consistent with the real definition or with Craig's. Please don't do that, it doesn't help me interpret what you believe, nor give any meaningful correction to Bruce's purported misdirection. Do you have a different definition for the term 'master' for use in Bruce's response to Craig? If so, I request you assert it. I believe Bruce made an accurate assessment of Craig's usage despite the differing definition in iTIP. I believe that Craig's usage meant the copy in the CU's storage. For the context of Bruce's response to Craig, and for that thread only or at least only that message, do you have a differing interpretation that would prevent us from moving forward on that discussion? This is an extemely sensitive topic capable of creating thousands of unproductive lines of text and we aren't off to a great start. I request that we all give each other a little more way leeway than is usual until we start getting some traction on the topic (which still hasn't even been clearly identified). And that really means _all_ of us (except of course the chairs, they can and should be able to crack down whenever they feel things are getting out of hand). Trying to reach understanding so that we may then try and move toward consensus, -- Michael --