Re: DTSTART for recurrence instances

Olivier Gutknecht <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.calendar
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 5 déc. 03, at 21:27, Doug Royer wrote:
> So, if the ORGANIZER sends the following iTIP object to ATTENDEE:
>
>    BEGIN:VEVENT
>    UID:XXX
>    SEQUENCE:0
>    ...
>    METHOD:REQUEST
>    ATTENDEE:attendee
>    ...
>    DTSTART: 1-dec-2003 at noon
>    DTEND: 1-dec-2003 at 1pm
>    ...
>    RRULE:FREQ=DAILY;COUNT=3
>    ...
>    END:VEVENT
>
> (And 'attendee' sends a  reply saying yes).
>
> Now later ORGANIZER sends an iTIP update to move the 2nd instance from 
>  noon->1pm
> and have it at 2pm->3:30pm:
>
>    BEGIN:VEVENT
>    UID:XXX
>    SEQUENCE:1
>    ...
>    METHOD:REQUEST
>    DTSTART:2-dec-2003 at 2pm
>    DTEND:2-dec-2003 at 3:30pm
>    RECURRENCE-ID:2-dec-2003 at noon
>    ..
>    END:VEVENT
>
> Do you agree that is a valid object to tell the ATTENDEE of the single 
> instance change?

I agree. iTIP to request that the instance identified by UID xxx and 
RECURRENCE-ID 2-dec-2003 noon (occurrence time) has now a DTSTART of 
2-dec-2003 2pm (and DTEND of 3:30pm). Although this was the first 
solution, let's call that 'method D' to differentiate it from the A, B, 
C proposals of your next mail.

Ol.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.