Re: DTSTART for recurrence instances
Olivier Gutknecht <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.calendar |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 5 déc. 03, at 21:27, Doug Royer wrote: > So, if the ORGANIZER sends the following iTIP object to ATTENDEE: > > BEGIN:VEVENT > UID:XXX > SEQUENCE:0 > ... > METHOD:REQUEST > ATTENDEE:attendee > ... > DTSTART: 1-dec-2003 at noon > DTEND: 1-dec-2003 at 1pm > ... > RRULE:FREQ=DAILY;COUNT=3 > ... > END:VEVENT > > (And 'attendee' sends a reply saying yes). > > Now later ORGANIZER sends an iTIP update to move the 2nd instance from > noon->1pm > and have it at 2pm->3:30pm: > > BEGIN:VEVENT > UID:XXX > SEQUENCE:1 > ... > METHOD:REQUEST > DTSTART:2-dec-2003 at 2pm > DTEND:2-dec-2003 at 3:30pm > RECURRENCE-ID:2-dec-2003 at noon > .. > END:VEVENT > > Do you agree that is a valid object to tell the ATTENDEE of the single > instance change? I agree. iTIP to request that the instance identified by UID xxx and RECURRENCE-ID 2-dec-2003 noon (occurrence time) has now a DTSTART of 2-dec-2003 2pm (and DTEND of 3:30pm). Although this was the first solution, let's call that 'method D' to differentiate it from the A, B, C proposals of your next mail. Ol.