Re: DTSTART for recurrence instances

In the interest of moving this along, can we get back to the matters at 
hand.  If anyone is going to reply to the list, it should be with 
constructive opinions/ideas/thoughts and not personality attacks.  That 
goes for everyone that participates on this list.



Mark Smith <[email protected]> 
Sent by: [email protected]
12/09/2003 18:00

To
[email protected]
cc

Subject
Re: DTSTART for recurrence instances







Michael Fair wrote:

He said 'master' introduces a new term. No it did not.

It has nothing to do with clarity, it has to do with shooting
from the hip yet again and backpedaling and not checking to
see if he sent was accurate.

> Mark, if you are going to waste our time beating up on Bruce,
> correct him if you think he is lying.
> 
> He asserted a definition and context for the term "master" for
> the sake of creating clarity.  If you disagree, then you have an
> obligation (in the context of being productive) to explain your
> understanding of said terms.  Bruce may be lying (I happen to
> agree with his side of this), but he is making an earnest effort
> to create clarity.  Please (hopefully starting with this last
> email), if you think Bruce is lying to us, correct him so that
> either you or he can adjust their views, or at worst at least
> understand what each other is saying.
> 
> -- Michael --
>