Re: DTSTART for recurrence instances

[email protected] wrote:
> 
> In the interest of moving this along, can we get back to the matters
> at hand.  If anyone is going to reply to the list, it should be with
> constructive opinions/ideas/thoughts and not personality attacks.
>  That goes for everyone that participates on this list.

I have said this on this list before and I will say it again, this
time to Bob.

Could you add a rule something like:

  Please read the drafts before posting and make sure that what you
  are about to say is true before posting. Some people make what
  seems to many to be an authoritative statement and after reading
  the RFC's or submitted drafts, they seem to have ignored specific
  parts of the text or declare it as (not valid). So such topics
  need to be tagged as 'iCal-next', 'itip-next' or whatever so they
  do not get confused with a discussion about what has actually been
  submitted.

And can there be some sort of suspension from the list when someone
repeatedly posts incorrect information to this list? I for one am
getting REAL tired of having to re-read the specs only to find out
that almost verbatim text exists in submitted text when others say
no such topic or item exists.