Re: "and so this is Christmas, and what have you done?"

On Wednesday, December 10 2003, "Doug Royer" wrote to "[email protected]" saying:

> 
> I have closed the one at http://INET-Consulting.com/bugzilla .
> Old records still viewable.

Should old calsch-related bugs be migrated over to the new Bugzilla?

> Helge Hess wrote:
> 
> >
> > On 10.12.2003, at 19:14, [email protected] wrote:
> >
> >> Helge, this is a great idea.  It would be great if you can do that 
> >> for us.
> >
> >
> > No problem, I've just created:
> > - a CALSCH product, which is the entry point for the group
> > - a component (read: topic/category) "general" for general issues
> > - a user "[email protected]" which is set as the initial owner
> >   for "general" issues (receives mail on each issue)
> >
> > So feel free to create an own account in Bugzilla for posting new 
> > issues. There are two forms, an easy one:
> >   http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/easy_enter_bug.cgi
> > and a "poweruser" one:
> >   http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=CALSCH
> >
> > Now we need to decide what additional "components" (discussion topics) 
> > we need - eg iMIP, CAP, Interoperability, ... - so that issues can be 
> > properly classified.
> >
> > Let me know if you need anything else.
> >
> > best regards,
> >   Helge
> >
> >>
> >> Helge Hess <[email protected]>
> >> Sent by: [email protected]
> >
> >
> >> Bugzilla is an excellent tool to track/classify/search issues, manage
> >> votes and do a "structured discussion".
> >>
> >> If this is of interest, we could jump in and create a Bugzilla category
> >> for calsch at the OpenGroupware.org Bugzilla:
> >>   http://bugzilla.opengroupware.org/bugzilla/index.cgi
> >
> 
> -- 
> 
> Doug Royer                     |   http://INET-Consulting.com
> -------------------------------|-----------------------------
> [email protected]                 | Office: (208)520-4044
> http://Royer.com/People/Doug   |    Fax: (866)594-8574
>                                |   Cell: (208)520-4044
> 
>                We Do Standards - You Need Standards
> 
>