Re: DTSTART for recurrence instances

Michael Fair wrote:

> The RECURRENCE-IDs are derived from the set described by the object
> with the UID in question but no RECURRENCE-ID property. period.
> The RECURRENCE-ID MUST NEVER be derived from the instance itself.
> If the instance is being stored as a separate object in the CS it
> must also track the RECURRENCE-ID value originally assigned to it.

How would the CS used by attendee-2 ever have that history in
order to find or track the originall and RECURRENCE-ID?

> There will never be a REQUEST object that redefines the set of
> instances and has a RECURRENCE-ID property.  To invoke the clause regarding
> a UID/SEQUENCE pair the RECURRENCE-ID property can not be present.

When you send and instance update you must bump the sequence, so the
set changes? correct?