Re: (RECUR-LIMIT) The intent/meaning of EXPAND and its usefullness
Doug Royer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.calendar |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://INET-Consulting.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> >There is a little confusion in the text then. >It would be helpful if it explicitly states that if STORES-EXPANDED is >true, >RECUR-EXPAND, RECUR-LIMIT, EXPAND are ignored. >At least is that what you said above? > I have made a note. Suggested text changes? You might want to use the new bugzilla recently posted and add it as an issue. >We can't support METHOD:ADD. >They have to create a new recurrence set or delete the old set and >create a new one. > > Okay, then that is an iTIP issues, not a CAP issue. The iTIP objects would react the same as in iMIP and thus no such additional instances could be added at the iTIP level. -- Doug Royer | http://INET-Consulting.com -------------------------------|----------------------------- [email protected] | Office: (208)520-4044 http://Royer.com/People/Doug | Fax: (866)594-8574 | Cell: (208)520-4044 We Do Standards - You Need Standards
smime.p7s
(application/x-pkcs7-signature, 4.6 KB) - not displayed