Re: request + add

Mark Smith <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.calendar
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Michael Fair wrote:

> >
> > Okay, now what if it gets the sequence:1 request and the sequence:2 'add'
> > as shown in 'B'.  As all three instances can not be represented in
> > one 'method request' object because the duration of all three instances
> > are not the same. Now the master object is at sequence:2, as is
> > attendee-2.
> 
> This can actually be described in one method:request object as I'll
> demonstrate below in response to a REFRESH request.  You are right
> if what you meant was that it can't be described in 1 VEVENT component.

However you did not do a request+add below which was the question.
You did a request + single instance reschedule.

> > The recurrence-id's can be calculated from what attendee-2 has. Correct?
> > And it will be the same recurrence-id's as organizer. Correct?
> 
> This sounds correct, but since we haven't rescheduled any of the instances
> yet it's not all that meaningful... 

As this topic is part of EXPAND:TRUE debate - yes it is valid.

Your example below is not the one asked.

> 
> The ORGANIZER will send the following message in response to the REFRESH:
> BEGIN:VCALENDAR
>   METHOD:REQUEST
> 
>   BEGIN:VEVENT
>    UID:XXX
>    SEQUENCE:2
>    ...
>    DTSTART: 1-dec-2003 at noon
>    DTEND: 1-dec-2003 at 1pm
>    ...
>    RDATE:3-dec-2003 at noon
>    RDATE:2-dec-2003 at 3:30
>   END:VEVENT
> 
>   BEGIN:VEVENT
>    UID:XXX
>    RECURRENCE-ID:2-dec-2003 at 3:30
>    SEQUENCE:2
>    ...
>    DTSTART: 2-dec-2003 at 3:30
>    DTEND: 2-dec-2003 at 5pm
>    ...
>   END:VEVENT
> 
> END:VCALENDAR
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.