Re: request + add
Mark Smith <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.calendar |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Michael Fair wrote: > > > > Okay, now what if it gets the sequence:1 request and the sequence:2 'add' > > as shown in 'B'. As all three instances can not be represented in > > one 'method request' object because the duration of all three instances > > are not the same. Now the master object is at sequence:2, as is > > attendee-2. > > This can actually be described in one method:request object as I'll > demonstrate below in response to a REFRESH request. You are right > if what you meant was that it can't be described in 1 VEVENT component. However you did not do a request+add below which was the question. You did a request + single instance reschedule. > > The recurrence-id's can be calculated from what attendee-2 has. Correct? > > And it will be the same recurrence-id's as organizer. Correct? > > This sounds correct, but since we haven't rescheduled any of the instances > yet it's not all that meaningful... As this topic is part of EXPAND:TRUE debate - yes it is valid. Your example below is not the one asked. > > The ORGANIZER will send the following message in response to the REFRESH: > BEGIN:VCALENDAR > METHOD:REQUEST > > BEGIN:VEVENT > UID:XXX > SEQUENCE:2 > ... > DTSTART: 1-dec-2003 at noon > DTEND: 1-dec-2003 at 1pm > ... > RDATE:3-dec-2003 at noon > RDATE:2-dec-2003 at 3:30 > END:VEVENT > > BEGIN:VEVENT > UID:XXX > RECURRENCE-ID:2-dec-2003 at 3:30 > SEQUENCE:2 > ... > DTSTART: 2-dec-2003 at 3:30 > DTEND: 2-dec-2003 at 5pm > ... > END:VEVENT > > END:VCALENDAR >