Re: request + add
Mark Smith <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.calendar |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Michael Fair wrote: > > "Mark Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:[email protected]... > > > > Michael Fair wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Okay, now what if it gets the sequence:1 request and the sequence:2 > 'add' > > > > as shown in 'B'. As all three instances can not be represented in > > > > one 'method request' object because the duration of all three > instances > > > > are not the same. Now the master object is at sequence:2, as is > > > > attendee-2. > > > > > > This can actually be described in one method:request object as I'll > > > demonstrate below in response to a REFRESH request. You are right > > > if what you meant was that it can't be described in 1 VEVENT component. > > > > However you did not do a request+add below which was the question. > > You did a request + single instance reschedule. > > I'm not quite sure how to respond to this. > I assure you that I responded accurately and completely to a request+add. Re check what you send, there is NOT a ADD. > > > BEGIN:VEVENT > > > UID:XXX > > > RECURRENCE-ID:2-dec-2003 at 3:30 > > > SEQUENCE:2 > > > ... > > > DTSTART: 2-dec-2003 at 3:30 > > > DTEND: 2-dec-2003 at 5pm > > > ... > > > END:VEVENT > > > > > > END:VCALENDAR > > > > > How is this not the example given? The example given was ADD which is NOT the object above. See the original post and section "3.2.4 ADD" in iTIP. > How is this not the question asked?