Re: request + add

Mark Smith <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.calendar
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Michael Fair wrote:
> 
> "Mark Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > Michael Fair wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > Okay, now what if it gets the sequence:1 request and the sequence:2
> 'add'
> > > > as shown in 'B'.  As all three instances can not be represented in
> > > > one 'method request' object because the duration of all three
> instances
> > > > are not the same. Now the master object is at sequence:2, as is
> > > > attendee-2.
> > >
> > > This can actually be described in one method:request object as I'll
> > > demonstrate below in response to a REFRESH request.  You are right
> > > if what you meant was that it can't be described in 1 VEVENT component.
> >
> > However you did not do a request+add below which was the question.
> > You did a request + single instance reschedule.
> 
> I'm not quite sure how to respond to this.
> I assure you that I responded accurately and completely to a request+add.

Re check what you send, there is NOT a ADD.

> > >   BEGIN:VEVENT
> > >    UID:XXX
> > >    RECURRENCE-ID:2-dec-2003 at 3:30
> > >    SEQUENCE:2
> > >    ...
> > >    DTSTART: 2-dec-2003 at 3:30
> > >    DTEND: 2-dec-2003 at 5pm
> > >    ...
> > >   END:VEVENT
> > >
> > > END:VCALENDAR
> > >
> 
> How is this not the example given?

The example given was ADD which is NOT the object above.
See the original post and section "3.2.4 ADD" in iTIP.

> How is this not the question asked?
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.