Re: request + add
Mark Smith <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.calendar |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Michael Fair wrote: > > > > The example given was ADD which is NOT the object above. > > See the original post and section "3.2.4 ADD" in iTIP. > > I think you are misunderstanding what object it is that's being > described here. So the question (restated) is: Once attendee-2 gets 'B' which is an 'add' (not some other things). As that is a valid way to invite an attendee. Do you agree that once 'B' is complete then attendee-2 can only get the recurrence-id's from what it has those objects described in 'B'. As attendee-2 attendee-2 will never have the sequence:0 object. A 'refresh' would only return 'A', 'B' or 'C' and not the sequence:0 iTIP message. So it can not be true that you have to have the history of an object to get the recurrence-id's. It also can not be true that the recurrence-id's are tied to the original (0) object. As it would be impossible to change an object that was later added with the add method. The attendee must be able to expand the 'A', 'B', or 'C' objects from themselves.