RE: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-caldav-00.txt
"Lisa Dusseault" <[email protected]> Mon, 22 Dec 2003 17:48:57 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.calendar |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <008a01c3c8f6$edeb0ba0$75c990c6@lisalap> |
The Exchange 2000 support for calendaring via WebDAV includes also some custom features, some proprietary features, etc. For example, it does not support the standard ACL model (currently in IESG review) for WebDAV. The problem would not be to extend the E2K model but to subset it, and as such, it is probably not possible to make it out-of-the-box compatible. I don't know if it would be possible to specify a Exchange 2000 compatible standard. There could be IPR issues, there could be information which isn't available to clients not in a Exchange security domain. Somebody at Microsoft would be able to answer these questions. OTOH, the model isn't really all that different. The basic proposal is to represent calendars as WebDAV collections, and to represent calendar events as WebDAV resources with a flat list of properties. Further, the properties roughly reflect iCalendar semantics. This is not incompatible with the way Exchange 2000 does it. Lisa > -----Original Message----- > From: Helge Hess [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 1:45 AM > To: Lisa Dusseault > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-caldav-00.txt > > > On Dec 19, 2003, at 12:17 AM, Lisa Dusseault wrote: > > Here's a proposal/exploration for calendar storage via > WebDAV, which > > was > > solicited at the Minneapolis WG meeting. Of course a lot of detail > > would > > need to be filled in if this were deemed worth pursuing. > > Well, personally I would *really* like to see some WebDAV based > calendaring standard - even a working paper on that would be > very much > appreciated, so that one can have at least a rough point of reference. > > What I dislike about your approach is, that it is a > completely new one. > I would prefer something which is compatible with the Exchange 2000 > WebDAV one for obvious reasons. Of course the E2K model could be > extended by various ways. > Do you have any issues with/opinions on that? > > best regards, > Helge > > > -----Original Message----- > ... > > Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-caldav-00.txt > ... > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dusseault-caldav-00.txt > -- > OpenGroupware.org => http://www.opengroupware.org/ > >