CAP-12: Stored queries STILL in?
[email protected] Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:13:47 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.calendar |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OFE6BE4DF6.DCEEA831-ON85256E20.006346DC-85256E20.00640C45@notesdev.ibm.com> |
In rescanning CAP-12 for changes I see that the editors have not removed all vestiges of stored queries from CAP 1.0. There is still text on QUERYID (8.27 QUERYID property) and several examples that use QUERYID. These should be removed for CAP 1.0 and be just part of any CAP followon that describes a stored query mechanism. In addition VQUERYs are still part of the object model in Section 3.2 Calendar Store Object Model. This too should be removed and proposed in the followon work. Otherwise CAP 1.0 will implicitly, if not explicitly, mandate that a CS MUST support stored VQUERYs which is not a reasonable requirement as we've covered ad naseum over the past 2 years. I propose that the QUERYID section be removed, the VQUERYs be removed from the model diagram (pp 20 & 21) and that QUERYID be removed from all examples. All the text can be moved to any followon work that stored query proponents want to propose for consideration. Bruce =========================================================================== Bruce Kahn INet: [email protected] Messaging & Collaboration Phone: 978.399.6496 IBM Software Group FAX: and nothing but the FAX... Standard disclaimers apply, even where prohibited by law...