Re: CAP-12: 10.12.1 Searching for VFREEBUSY (expand)

[email protected] wrote:

>
> First off, why is VFREEBUSY contingent on the CS's ability or 
> inability to RECUR-EXPAND?   Since RECUR-EXPAND is defined as:

If the CS allows the CUA to store non-expanted objects.
AND IF  the CS can NOT expand objects.

Then there is NO WAY the CS can auto-expand them and create a
dynamic VFREEBUSY object as many on this WG list want.

This is an iTIP problem as well as there is NO requirement for iTIP 
endpoints
to all support recurring rules.

And we covered this already last month and in the discussions that
led up to the text being inserted.

-- 

Doug Royer                     |   http://INET-Consulting.com
-------------------------------|-----------------------------
[email protected]                 | Office: (208)520-4044
http://Royer.com/People/Doug   | Fax: (866)594-8574
                               | Cell: (208)520-4044

              We Do Standards - You Need Standards