Re: Stored queries.

Tim Hare wrote:

>
> Would STORED-VQUERY be a mandatory part of the capability reply?


We should add ...

    New property - STORED-VQUERY. If the value contains <RFC-XXXX>
    (WHERE XXXX will be replaced by THIS memos RFC) they are supported
    as defined in this RFC.   If empty or not supplied then the endpoint 
does
    not support stored vqueries.

Then add STORED-VQUERY to the 'cap-vreply' as *dstored-vquery

And add something like this to the GET-CAPABILITY section.

  Any future BOOLEAN property extensions to the GET-CAPABILITY reply
  must be designed so that FALSE indicates the feature is not supported. Any
  feature not listed in a GET-CAPABILITY reply must be presumed to be
  not supported or the value not available.

-- 

Doug Royer                     |   http://INET-Consulting.com
-------------------------------|-----------------------------
[email protected]                 | Office: (208)520-4044
http://Royer.com/People/Doug   | Fax:    (866)594-8574
                               | Cell:   (208)520-4044

              We Do Standards - You Need Standards