Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?

Tim replied on 06/03/2004 10:49:10 PM:
> It seems to me that a component should be the "atomic" element retrieved 

> for queries, and the CUA should do its own parsing/query of properties 
to 
> find out more of the details, but that's just my opinion. I would like 
to 
> go back and read some of the QUERY development process in the archives - 

> does anyone have a guess about what timeframes this was taking place?

Pat has an online Full Text indexed copy of the WG archive going back to 
1996 when the WG was created.  I dont have the URL she posted but it 
should be available here or you can poke her in case shes not following 
this thread.  That should allow you to full text search the archives for 
phrases like "VEVENT.*" or whatever.

Bruce
===========================================================================
Bruce Kahn                                INet: 
[email protected]
Messaging & Collaboration                 Phone: 978.399.6496
IBM Software Group                         FAX: and nothing but the FAX...
Standard disclaimers apply, even where prohibited by law...