Re: CAP-13: Another CAL-QUERY / VAGENDA question
Doug Royer <[email protected]> Fri, 04 Jun 2004 10:05:36 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.calendar |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] wrote: > > Can anyone point me to the parts I missing that describe "*.*"? I > also question the need/use of "*.*" for VAGENDA and VCALSCALE. Why > aren't the same rules from Section 6.1.1 sufficient for VAGENDA and > VCALSCALE but they are sufficient for all other components that have > the same nesting structure? Originally * was designed to NOT get components, later the WG decided that it was to get components except for VAGENDA and VCALSORE. Then there was no way to get the properties only for a VAGENDA and VCALSTORE, so we added '*.*' We had 1 or 2 interim meeting and phone calls (remember the ones that you organized?) that kept (among other things) evolving the query syntax. Then there were several edits over time. We need a way to get top level properties and not contained components. And we need to way to get everything. '*' vs '*.*' just strings as far as I am concerned. -- Doug Royer | http://INET-Consulting.com -------------------------------|----------------------------- [email protected] | Office: (208)520-4044 http://Royer.com/People/Doug | Fax: (866)594-8574 | Cell: (208)520-4044 We Do Standards - You Need Standards
smime.p7s
(application/x-pkcs7-signature, 4.6 KB) - not displayed