Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?
Doug Royer <[email protected]> Fri, 04 Jun 2004 14:24:16 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.calendar |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > It may be useful for doing a "find me all properties and subcomponents > that exist in this container" but I strongly doubt that its something > done on a regular basis. It can be useful for debugging or protoyping > purposes but not for normal CU day to day actions. It is used every time I load a calendar from an unknown source. One vendor has two modes it uses timezones and both with the same PRODID. Not all properties are in all objects even when they are the same type. The feature is documented. And works. And even if you do not want to use the feature it appears from this conversation that you did understand from CAP what that feature does when called. So it does not fall into the bug, broken, typo, or grammer category. And I thought that feature changes were off topic and we were into get CAP done mode. -- Doug Royer | http://INET-Consulting.com -------------------------------|----------------------------- [email protected] | Office: (208)520-4044 http://Royer.com/People/Doug | Fax: (866)594-8574 | Cell: (208)520-4044 We Do Standards - You Need Standards
smime.p7s
(application/x-pkcs7-signature, 4.6 KB) - not displayed