Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?

Doug Royer <[email protected]> Fri, 04 Jun 2004 14:24:16 -0600
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.calendar
Message-ID <[email protected]>

>
> It may be useful for doing a "find me all properties and subcomponents 
> that exist in this container" but I strongly doubt that its something 
> done on a regular basis.  It can be useful for debugging or protoyping 
> purposes but not for normal CU day to day actions.

It is used every time I load a calendar from an unknown source. One 
vendor has
two modes it uses timezones and both with the same PRODID. Not all 
properties are in all objects
even when they are the same type.

The feature is documented. And works. And even if you do not want to use 
the feature
it appears from this conversation that you did understand from  CAP  
what that
feature does when called. So it does not fall into the bug, broken, 
typo, or grammer category.
And I thought that feature changes were off topic and we were into get 
CAP done mode.

-- 

Doug Royer                     |   http://INET-Consulting.com
-------------------------------|-----------------------------
[email protected]                 | Office: (208)520-4044
http://Royer.com/People/Doug   | Fax:    (866)594-8574
                               | Cell:   (208)520-4044

              We Do Standards - You Need Standards
smime.p7s (application/x-pkcs7-signature, 4.6 KB) - not displayed