Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?

Doug Royer <[email protected]> Fri, 11 Jun 2004 11:40:31 -0600
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.calendar
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>
> 1: Component integrity is not always preserved.


So you say. EXACTLY HOW?

>  There has been no justification given for the component-name.* use in 
> the SELECT clause.  It results in data that is all mushed togther and 
> not useable as returned.
> 2: There are "special cases" in CAP that result in different formats 
> returning the same data.  So far there has been no reason given for 
> why we need the special cases really. 

Simply not true.

-- 

Doug Royer                     |   http://INET-Consulting.com
-------------------------------|-----------------------------
[email protected]                 | Office: (208)520-4044
http://Royer.com/People/Doug   | Fax:    (866)594-8574
                               | Cell:   (208)520-4044

              We Do Standards - You Need Standards
smime.p7s (application/x-pkcs7-signature, 4.6 KB) - not displayed