Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?
Doug Royer <[email protected]> Fri, 11 Jun 2004 11:40:31 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.calendar |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > 1: Component integrity is not always preserved. So you say. EXACTLY HOW? > There has been no justification given for the component-name.* use in > the SELECT clause. It results in data that is all mushed togther and > not useable as returned. > 2: There are "special cases" in CAP that result in different formats > returning the same data. So far there has been no reason given for > why we need the special cases really. Simply not true. -- Doug Royer | http://INET-Consulting.com -------------------------------|----------------------------- [email protected] | Office: (208)520-4044 http://Royer.com/People/Doug | Fax: (866)594-8574 | Cell: (208)520-4044 We Do Standards - You Need Standards
smime.p7s
(application/x-pkcs7-signature, 4.6 KB) - not displayed