Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?

As Ted points out, when an issue is contentious it is the chairs who will
declare closure after seeking consensus.  I think the reasonable
interpretation of Doug's comment is that he sees no consensus to change
the document at this time based on Bruce's comments.  The chairs are
inclined to agree with that view, even though we understand Bruce's
points.  If no other implementors (or other reviewers) are prepared to
support the position that these constructs need to be changed or removed,
then they will stand as written, at least for purposes of producing a
last-callable CAP document; so please comment *now* if you want to see
changes.  We are inclined to think that the discussion indicates a need
for actual response data along with the example queries in this section,
to clarify what the response is supposed to be (and maybe support the
"mush" point of view).  But we won't ask the editor to make that change
unless others also think it would be useful.

 - RL "Bob" and Pat