Re: proposed revised charter for IETF calsch WG

> In any case, at this point we suggest that the best course is to
> complete CAP under the banner of this WG, and to have the RFC 2445-7
> revisions, if any, happen either as individual work or in a new WG
> chartered for that purpose.

Since someone asked, it's certainly my expectation that this list would
remain available indefinitely for discussions of all the calsch RFCs and
related calendaring stuff, including individual work, if any, on RFC
revisions.  So no need for new lists, at least not until a new WG is
chartered.

 - RL "Bob"