Re: Item missing from Bob's list of unresolved items in Bugzilla...
Nathaniel Borenstein <[email protected]> Wed, 4 Aug 2004 12:31:44 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.calendar |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
While I have serious questions about the ongoing value of CALSCALE for the ical revisions, I completely support the idea that backward compatibility will be enhanced if all implementations report their CALSCALE capability (or, at the moment, obviously, their lack thereof). -- nathaniel On Aug 3, 2004, at 8:49 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > It's still may be a small issue - but I would still like to see the > chairs call for consensus on whether or not CALSCALE should be a > _required_ property returned by the GET-CAPABILITY command. This is > issue 491 in the Bugzilla list - I believe the first one added after > this new list was started. I strongly feel that this should be > required, since CALSCALE could affect how other things work in a > calendar. > > > > Tim Hare > Interested Bystander, Non-Inc. > > >