Re: Item missing from Bob's list of unresolved items in Bugzilla...

Nathaniel Borenstein <[email protected]> Wed, 4 Aug 2004 12:31:44 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.calendar
Message-ID <[email protected]>
While I have serious questions about the ongoing value of CALSCALE for 
the ical revisions, I completely support the idea that backward 
compatibility will be enhanced if all implementations report their 
CALSCALE capability (or, at the moment, obviously, their lack thereof). 
  -- nathaniel

On Aug 3, 2004, at 8:49 PM, [email protected] wrote:

>
> It's still may be a small issue - but I would still like to see the 
> chairs call for consensus on whether or not CALSCALE should be a 
> _required_ property returned by the GET-CAPABILITY command. This is 
> issue 491 in the Bugzilla list - I believe the first one added after 
> this new list was started.  I strongly feel that this should be 
> required, since CALSCALE could affect how other things work in a 
> calendar.
>
>
>
> Tim Hare
> Interested Bystander, Non-Inc.
>
>
>