Re: Re iCal-Basic - draft 00

[email protected] Sat, 08 Jan 2005 21:12:08 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.calendar
Message-ID <[email protected]>
In the most common use cases (which we can assume iCal-Basic is aiming 
for), an event is either an "appointment", which is a personal event that 
starts at a certain time and lasts for a period of time; or it's a 
"meeting" which is a multi-user event that starts at a certain time and 
lasts for a period of time.

I therefore would recommend DTSTART and DURATION in the iCal-Basic spec. 
Various implementations can, of course, choose to also store the DTEND 
information, but should use DURATION when exchanging information with other 
implementations.

Tim


t 12:42 PM 1/8/05, Doug Royer wrote:

>I know that there was a large debate on having both DURATION
>and DTEND years ago that resulted in 2445. Now that we are trying
>to simplify down to  the basics. Can we pick just one?
>
>     DTSTART and optionally DURATION (no  DTEND in spec)
>
>or
>
>     DTSTART and optionally DTEND. (no DURATION in spec)
>
>This is an data format for exchanging calendar information, it has
>nothing to do with how any implementation stores the data. Is the
>reason that both existed because the WG could not decide? Or
>was there another reason?
>
>--
>
>Doug Royer                     | http://INET-Consulting.com
>-------------------------------|-----------------------------
>[email protected]                 | Office: (208)612-4638
>http://Royer.com               | Fax:    (866)594-8574
>                                | Cell:   (208)520-4044
>
>               We Do Standards - You Need Standards
>
>
>

Tim Hare
Interested Bystander, Non-Inc.