Re: Re iCal-Basic - draft 00
[email protected] Sat, 08 Jan 2005 21:12:08 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.calendar |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In the most common use cases (which we can assume iCal-Basic is aiming for), an event is either an "appointment", which is a personal event that starts at a certain time and lasts for a period of time; or it's a "meeting" which is a multi-user event that starts at a certain time and lasts for a period of time. I therefore would recommend DTSTART and DURATION in the iCal-Basic spec. Various implementations can, of course, choose to also store the DTEND information, but should use DURATION when exchanging information with other implementations. Tim t 12:42 PM 1/8/05, Doug Royer wrote: >I know that there was a large debate on having both DURATION >and DTEND years ago that resulted in 2445. Now that we are trying >to simplify down to the basics. Can we pick just one? > > DTSTART and optionally DURATION (no DTEND in spec) > >or > > DTSTART and optionally DTEND. (no DURATION in spec) > >This is an data format for exchanging calendar information, it has >nothing to do with how any implementation stores the data. Is the >reason that both existed because the WG could not decide? Or >was there another reason? > >-- > >Doug Royer | http://INET-Consulting.com >-------------------------------|----------------------------- >[email protected] | Office: (208)612-4638 >http://Royer.com | Fax: (866)594-8574 > | Cell: (208)520-4044 > > We Do Standards - You Need Standards > > > Tim Hare Interested Bystander, Non-Inc.