Re: More recurrence rule clarifications sought

Quoting [email protected], on Thu, May 05, 2005 at 02:00:47PM -0400:
> 
> > From: [email protected] 
> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
> > Reinhold Kainhofer
> > Note that all BY* rules are AND'ed together, not OR'ed. 
> > Otherwise the example in rfc 2445 (sec. 4.3.10) would give a 
> > recurrence at all times when the minutes are equal to 30, not 
> > just at 8:30 and 9:30
> 
> Ah, right, of course.
> 
> Further question:
> 
> What is the next element in the recurrence set for this rule:
> 
>   DTSTART:20000131T000000Z
>   RRULE:FREQ=MONTHLY
> 
> Is it February 29, 2000?

No, its Mar 31.

If applying an RRULE generates a time that can't exist, it doesn't
exist.

Cheers,
Sam