Re: TZ: polygon
Simon Vaillancourt <[email protected]> Fri, 08 Jul 2005 13:54:42 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.calsify,gmane.ietf.calendar |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I'm saying it breaks RFC2445 because the formal definition of a VTIMEZONE component does not include anything allowing the addition of such property, if the formal definition had a iana-token, then it could be added. --Simon Doug Royer wrote: > > So in other words, you do not know if breaks anything? > You just think they would break? > > Simon Vaillancourt wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Doug Royer wrote: >> >>> >>> Any parser that it breaks is not 2445 compliant (unless you >>> have some specific reason or bug in the draft >>> you have not yet stated).. >>> >> >> Maybe I missed something in 2445 but, in section 4.6.5, the formal >> definition of a VTIMEZONE object does not seem to contain anything >> allowing the addition of new non-"x-prop" parameters in a VTIMEZONE >> component(i.e.: iana-token). So if you do a parser and it validates >> the data using the formal definitions i will break (But yes most >> parsers are more forgiving than that). >>