Re: xCal - time to submit?

Nevertheless, your original message had calsify WG in the To header field.

My reply was simply a reminder, that that particular IETF WG (being the 
only active IETF WG addressed) is not responsible for this work, and 
that any submission of xCal to the IESG is by an *individual* and not 
endorsed by the working group. That's all.

Cheers,
Aki

ext Doug Royer wrote:
> 
> I may have forgot to set the REPLY-TO the xCal mailing list.
> Often others overrode or ignored that.
> 
> And we have to post announcements to all related lists, else we are
> told to when we ask for final last call.
> 
> 
> Aki Niemi wrote:
> 
>> Speaking as calsify chair, I'd simply like to point out that this 
>> would in any case be strictly an individual effort; XML representation 
>> of iCalendar is firmly out of the scope of the calsify WG.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Aki
>>
>